Saturday 31 October 2015

DVR Alert: Roger Ebert Documentary LIFE ITSELF Airs On CNN Tonight



Film fans, and in particular fans of film criticism, should take note that Steve James' excellent 2014 documentary LIFE ITSELF airs tonight on CNN.

The documentary, one of my favorite films of the last year, takes a loving look at the life of movie critic legend Roger Ebert, who passed in 2013 after a 10-year battle with thyroid cancer.

Read my review of the insightful, funny, and profoundly touching biodoc from when it ran theatrically in my neck of the woods (at the Colony Theater in Raleigh last summer):


Also check out writer/critic extraordinaire Matt Zoller Seitz, who among many credits is editor-in-chief at rogerebert.com, discussing the documentary on a segment that aired yesterday on CNN.

Finally, if you're somehow not convinced to watch the film about the incredibly influential writer and personality yet, here's the trailer:


Airing as an installment in the CNN Presents series, LIFE ITSELF airs this evening at 9 pm.

More later...

INHERENT VICE: The Film Babble Blog Review


Opening today at an indie art house near me:

INHERENT VICE
(Dir. Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)


In a recent interview on Marc Maron?s WTF podcast, writer/director Paul Thomas Anderson claimed he wasn?t a stoner, that he really didn?t get stoned. 

Well, INHERENT VICE, Anderson?s adaptation of Thomas Pynchon?s 2009 comic-noir novel of the same name, coulda fooled me.

It?s such a rambling, sprawling, shaggy dog story with a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous as The Dude would say, all filtered through hazy clouds of pot smoke that it feels like it could?ve only been made by a filmmaker who?s stoned out of his mind.

Of course, my mention of The Dude doesn?t come from out of the blue. The film?s depiction of a countercultural underdog unraveling connections throughout the seedy underworld of Los Angeles heavily recalls the Coen brothers? THE BIG LEBOWSKI (1998), as well as Robert Altman?s THE LONG GOODBYE (1973).

Pynchon?s novel seemed to have those references embedded in it as well, and Anderson puts forth a largely faithful take on the original source material, right down to the exact wording of large chunks of the book?s dialogue.

In his second film for Anderson following 2012?s THE MASTER, Joaquin Phoenix plays pothead protagonist Larry ?Doc? Sportello, a long-haired, unkempt sideburns-sporting private investigator living in Gordita Beach, California in 1970. Doc?s ex-girlfriend Shasta (the pretty and appropriately flighty Katherine Waterson) shows up after an absence of over a year, and asks him for his help concerning her current boyfriend, a real estate mogul named Mickey Wolfman (Eric Roberts).

Mickey?s wife (Serena Scott Thomas) and her lover, are working on what Shasta calls ?a creepy little scheme? to have her rich husband committed to a mental institution so that they can make off with his fortune.

From there, Phoenix?s Doc gets hired by The Wire?s Michael Kenneth Williams as a member of the ?Black Guerilla Family? gang to find a white supremacist, named Glenn Charlock (Christopher Allen Nelson), who happens to be one of Mickey?s bodyguards.

After following a lead that ends up with our extremely high hero getting knocked unconscious at a Massage parlor named Chick Planet, Doc is questioned by his long-time cop nemesis, Christian ?Bigfoot? Bjornsen (Josh Brolin, going big and succeeding), a thick-necked, flat-topped, hippie-hating hardass member of the LAPD.

Luckily, Benicio Del Toro as slick marine lawyer Sauncho Smilax swoops in to get Doc released, but, unluckily, Shasta and Mickey have completely disappeared into thin air.

As if things weren?t complicated enough, Doc takes on another case that?s possibly related, involving the death of surf-rock saxophonist Coy Harlingen (a whispering Owen Wilson) as his widow Hope (Jena Malone) thinks he?s still alive.

From there, Doc visits with his special lady friend, Deputy D.A. Penny Kimball, played by Phoenix?s WALK THE LINE co-star Reese Witherspoon, gets interrogated by FBI agents (Parenthood?s Sam Jaeger and Veep?s Timothy Simons), and, most amusingly, does cocaine with Martin Short as an coked-up dentist. Doc?s trail keeps leading to some sinister entity called ?Golden Fang,? which is either a mysterious ship for running drugs, an Indo-Chinese heroin cartel, and/or a syndicate of dentists. I?m still not sure which.

Making her film debut, indie singer/songwriter Joanna Newsom serve as the film?s onscreen narrator Sortil?ge, a minor character in the book but here the custodian to descriptions of Doc?s inner thoughts, somewhat surreally I might add.

Which means that one minute, Doc is driving with Sortil?ge riding shotgun telling us about ?the long, sad history of LA land use,? and the next minute she?s gone. The freshness of Newsom's delivery of Pynchon's prose enhances the dry sections of the film considerably.

The fading of the sunny idealistic ?60s into the scary, smacked out ?70s is conveyed strikingly through Robert Elswit?s always stunning cinematography (Elswit has shot 6 of Anderson?s 7 movies), which gives both dark, dank interiors and sun-bleached exteriors a great burnt-out look, and the score by Radiohead?s Johnny Greenwood mixed with well chosen songs by Neil Young, Can, Lex Baxter, and the Chuck Jackson Motown classic ?Any Day Now,? perfectly evokes the era as well.

Unfortunately INHERENT VICE is no masterpiece. It?s frustratingly low energy at times with scenes that linger on and on. Many critics are calling it ?incoherent vice? (there?s a joke I bet will be made at the Oscars) for understandable reasons, but while I sometimes stared at the screen and thought that it was a meandering mess, I was more often struck by the brilliance of many of its moments.

I?ve seen it twice now, and I enjoyed and ?got it? a lot more the second time. Phoenix's performance, which initially bothered me as being half-assed, seemed more nuanced (I could see that he was really using his full ass), and I felt more of a poetry to its slow pace 
than before.

Being the first ever adaptation of a Pynchon novel ? books that many have said are unfilmable - is no small feat, and I can?t imagine anybody doing a better job with this particular material than Anderson.

Folks who aren?t Anderson or Pynchon fans going in aren?t likely to be won over, especially at its long-ass length of 2 and a half hours, but those who are hip to its vibe and can get into a groove with its stoned tone are likely to think it?s a gas, man. Sorry, to lay that outdated lingo on you, but I bet deep down you dig it.

More later...

The Touching, Timely SELMA Should Be Mandatory Viewing


Now playing at a multiplex near you:

SELMA
(Dir. Ava DuVernay, 2014)


Despite the accusations of inaccuracies, Ava DuVernay?s SELMA is the only 2014 film based on true events that ought to be mandatory viewing. As in, kids should be dragged to it, it should be shown in schools, etc.

SELMA?s stirring depiction of one of the most important episodes in civil rights history, the civil rights protest march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama, in 1965, provides a profoundly powerful lesson about how people can pull together to rise above oppression.

It?s a timeless lesson, especially given the similarities to the protests and riots that have resulted from the fatal shooting of 18-year old African American Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, last summer, that hammers home philosopher and cultural critic George Santayana?s famous saying, ?Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.?

Although the bulk of the film concerns the campaign to secure equal voting rights in 1965, SELMA begins with a few scenes set in the years leading up to that period.

First, we see Martin Luther King Jr. (David Oyelowo) preparing his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964. The legendary civil rights leader?s wife Coretta Scott (Carmen Ejogo) helps him with his tie in this backstage glimpse which shows him as a vulnerable, nervous man, not an unflappable icon.

Then, first-time screenwriter Paul Webb?s narrative takes us back to 1963, when the Ku Klux Klan bombed the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, killing four girls. Even if you know your history, the scene is a shocking sight; one that won?t soon fade from memory.

Those who don?t know their history may be confused by the chronology, but from this point on ? that is, after King?s meeting with President Lyndon B. Johnson (Tom Wilkinson) in the Oval Office in December, 1965 ? the film focuses on the tumultuous three-month movement in early ?65.

Wilkinson?s LBJ tells Oyelow?s MLK Jr. that because of a hundred other problems ? Vietnam, poverty, Medicare, immigration reform, etc. - ?This voting thing is just going to have to wait.?

Nonplussed, MLK Jr. travels to Selma to get the ball rolling with the help of of his Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which included such members as Andrew Young (Andre Holland), Ralph Abernathy (Colman Domingo), Reverend James Bevel (Common), , James Orange (Omar Dorsey), Hosea Williams (Wendell Pierce) and Amelia Boynton (Lorraine Toussaint).

Meanwhile, LBJ deals with J. Edgar Hoover (Dylan Baker) who wants to discredit King, and becomes furious that Alabama Governor George Wallace (Tim Roth) has vowed to stop the march.

A violent scuffle in Selma, in which Oprah Winfrey (one of the film's producers) as Annie Lee Cooper, a hospice nurse who had previously tried several times to register to vote, punches ultra racist Sheriff Jim Clark (Stan Houston), leads to King and many of his people getting arrested.

The violence escalates when state troopers attack activists on a night march, and Jimmie Lee Jackson (Keith Stanfield) gets shot and killed by one of the police.

But the most devastating incident of the entire movement, and one of the most searing sequences on film of this last year, is undoubtedly the ?Bloody Sunday? confrontation, in which 600 marchers were attacked by Alabama police and angry posses who tried to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge on March 7, 1965.

The massacre as it intensely unfolds can be hard to watch, but Duvernay?s cut-aways to folks? horrified reactions ? most notably LBJ?s - as they watch it on grainy black and white television sets ? got me so caught up in the outrage that is was impossible to look away.

SELMA gets so much right in its portrayal of the passion of the protesters in the face of the severe stakes involved, that the quibbles about its mischaracterization of LBJ?s motivations are seriously misplaced.

In real life, LBJ wasn?t as hesitant to introduce a voting rights bill as shown in the film, but the film hardly depicts him as a villain. Wilkinson (who like Oyellow is British) brings a stressed-out air to the role, something he?s used to great effect in a great many movies playing morally questionable characters, but here the notion is that he?s a politician first and foremost.

This can still be seen as a flaw in the film?s framework, as are a few moments that are wrapped in melodrama, but not one that takes away from the heart pounding impact of this excellent epic.

Oyelowo, a name that everybody should learn, is sure to get an Oscar nomination for his amazing performance as MLK. He brings a gravitas to King that I?ve not seen him muster before, particularly when compared to his role as the subversive son of THE BUTLER just last year. Oyelowo doesn?t really resemble King, but he successfully channels him in both the quiet, troubled moments behind the scenes, and the famous, powerfully moving speeches we?ve all heard throughout our lives.

Cinematographer Bradford Young is also certain to get award season action for greatly giving the imagery what he called in an interview a ?period, Kodachrome-esque look.? (If Young isn?t nominated for an Oscar for this then his superb work in J.C. Chandor?s A MOST VIOLENT YEAR will certainly get a nod).

The touching, timely SELMA is the best historical drama of 2014. It?s unfortunate that its story is still strongly such a necessary one to pass down, but even without recent events, it?s one that should be forever told.

More later...

Clint Eastwood's AMERICAN SNIPER: Decent But Not Very Deep


Now playing at a multiplex near you:

AMERICAN SNIPER (Dir. Clint Eastwood, 2014)


With several sequences dealing with a soldier having trouble adjusting to civilian life after intense tours in Iraq, this film often feels like Clint Eastwood?s THE HURT LOCKER.

But the crusty but lovable filmmaker, who?s 34th film as director this is, obviously feels he has bigger fish to fry here than that film?s ?war is a drug? theme.

AMERICAN SNIPER, Eastwood?s new biopic of Chris Kyle (1974-2013), the late Navy SEAL who from 1999 to 2009 racked up the most career sniper kills (over 160 confirmed enemy kills) in U.S. military history, wants to both pay tribute to the man as a modern war hero, and provide a platform for his redemption as a murderer.

It?s not entirely successful in those goals, but it?s Eastwood?s best film as director since 2008?s GRAN TORINO, proving that the man is much better at capturing combat than maneuvering through the tried and true tropes of musical biopics (see last year?s ultra trivial JERSEY BOYS).

In a performance that?s worthy of the Oscar nomination he scored this week, a beefed up Bradley Cooper plays Kyle, who we follow from being a good ole boy Texas ranch hand and rodeo cowboy to becoming a celebrated Army rifleman whose fellow Navy SEALS called ?The Legend.?

Cooper?s Kyle, a vessel of extreme patriotism, spends four dangerous tours of duty in Iraq, where we see him mostly stationed on rooftops providing cover for the troops below. In one central scene, which the film opens on then comes back to later in the narrative, Kyle weighs whether or not to shoot an Iraqi woman and a young boy, after seeing in his site that they were about to lob a grenade at a group of Marines on the street.

This is an intense, defining scene, one that TV spots for the film use as a cliffhanger (will he/won't he shoot? - see the movie and find out), and it is effective, but like the movie itself, it doesn't plow that deep into Kyle's character.

Kyle, who constantly calls the Islamist insurgents ?savages,? does appear, in fleeting bits of dialogue, to be strongly in favor of the Iraq war, but the film itself is fairly ambiguous about it.

Kyle?s camaraderie with his fellow SEAL team members, who include Luke Grimes, Kyle Gallner, and Jake McDorman, is familiar feeling but still necessary material in the mix, possibly giving the most insight into what the film thinks the guy was like.

When Kyle is stateside between deployments with his wife Tara (Sienna Miller) and kids, he has the expected trouble adjusting to civilian life, but the aforementioned THE HURT LOCKER went through these motions much more effectively; here it?s way too spelled out.

There?s an action movie drive, which the film is really more about, to Kyle and his team?s hunt for an Al Qaeda terrorist named ?The Butcher? (German-Egyptian actor Mido Hamada), and an enemy Syrian sniper named Mustafa (Sammy Sheik), in which we're simply watching a good guys vs. bad guys scenario with noisy shoot-outs and chases. All compellingly shot by Eastwood?s longtime cinematographer Tom Stern.

The big climatic battle, taking place on our lead?s fourth and final tour, has Kyle and his unit surrounded by terrorists as a sandstorm approaches. It?s truly exciting stuff, a sequence that proves how much pure machismo Eastwood can still muster at his late age.

Sure, the film hugely oversimplifies, making combat look like a video game at times, and it won't satisfy the folks who are complaining about its supposed pro-war stance, but it falls in line with what Eastwood has been saying cinematically his entire career. Consider that his iconic Dirty Harry character was considered by many to be ?fascist? back in the day.

In a way Eastwood's film, via Jason Hall's screenplay adaptation of Kyle's 2012 autobiography, is like the protagonist's phone calls home to his wife; it?s tight-lipped about what?s really going down on in the guy?s mind.

It basically seems to come down to saying this guy believed in what he was doing for his country, but he was a little conflicted by it. That may anger folks who feel that the real-life Kyle had no remorse over his killings and cite passages that say as much in his book, but, for me, the movie version of Kyle never wrote a book.

That is, like all the other films that are based on true stories out there, especially the ones that are Oscar nominated, AMERICAN SNIPER shouldn?t be taken as fact. Moviegoers going in should just ignore all the pundits and think pieces, and just take it as an old fashioned war movie with a smidgen of new school conscience that features an invested, career best performance by Cooper carrying one of Eastwood?s most well constructed productions.

More later...

Film Babble Blog?s Top 10 Movies of 2014 (Plus Their Key Lines)


Since the Oscar nominations were announced a week ago, and I?m pretty caught up on all the major, and not so major, movies of 2014, it?s time to list my 10 favorite films of last year (plus some spillover). This time instead of providing a blurb for each entry, I?m going to only highlight a key line, or at least what I think is one of the most memorable, for each movie. Also, unlike in previous year?s lists, I?m listing them from 10 down to 1. Click on the film's titles to read my original reviews:

10. CALVARY (Dir. John Michael McDonagh)


Father James Lavelle (Brendan Gleeson): ?The commandment ?Thou shalt not kill? does not have an asterisk beside it, referring you to the bottom of the page where you find a list of instances where it's okay to kill people.?

9. ONLY LOVERS LEFT ALIVE
(Dir. Jim Jarmusch)


Adam (Tom Hiddleston): ?You drank Ian.?

(Dir. Wes Anderson)



M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes): ?The most dreadful and unattractive person only needs to be loved and they will open up like a flower.?
Also: ?I sleep with all my friends.?

(Dirs. Phil Lord & Christopher Miller)


Vitruvius (Morgan Freeman): ?The only thing anyone needs to be special is to believe that you can be - I know that sounds like a cat poster, but it?s true.?

6. INHERENT VICE (Dir. Paul Thomas Anderson)



Dr. Rudy Blatnoyd, D.D.S. (Martin Short): ?It?s not groovy to be insane.?

5. SELMA (Dir. Ava DuVernay)



Martin Luther King (David Oyellowo): ?That means protest! That means march! That means disturb the peace! That means jail! That means risk! That is hard!?

4. WHIPLASH (Dir. Damien Chazelle)



Fletcher (J.K. Simmons): ?My dear god, are you one of those single tear people??

3. LIFE ITSELF (Dir. Steve James)



Roger Ebert: ?Look at a movie that a lot of people love and you?ll find something profound no matter how silly the film may seem.?

2. BIRDMAN (Dir. Alejandro Gonz?lez I??rritu)




Riggan Thomson as his inner Birdman (Michael Keaton): ?People, they love blood. They love action. Not this artsy fartsy, philosophical bullshit?

1. BOYHOOD (Dir. Richard Linklater)


?Never leave your mother?s womb, unless you wanna see how hard a broken heart can swoon.? - Tweedy (from the end credits song ?Summer Noon?)

And now, in no particular order, a bunch of 2014 spillover, with a few of their key lines too:

EDGE OF TOMORROW (Dir. Doug Liman) ?Okay, first of all, terrific presentation. Just Terrific.?

FRANK (Dir. Lenny Abrahamson)

NIGHTCRAWLER (Dir. Dan Gilroy)  ?Do you know what fear stands for? False Evidence Appearing Real.?

WILD (Dir. Jean-Marc Vall?e)

THE RAID 2 (Dir. Gareth Evans)


GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY (Dir. James Gunn): ?It's got a real shining-blue suitcase, Ark of the Covenant, Maltese Falcon sort of vibe.?

FORCE MAJEURE (Dir. Ruben ?stlund)

A MOST VIOLENT YEAR (Dir. J.C. Chandor)

GONE GIRL (Dir. David Fincher) ?We're so cute. I wanna punch us in the face.?

UNDER THE SKIN (Dir. Jonathan Glazer)

JOHN WICK (Dir. David Leitch & Chad Stahelski)?Oh.?

All in all, not a bad year for film.

More later...

Blu Ray/DVD Review: THE BOOK OF LIFE


Releasing this week on Blu ray & DVD:


THE BOOK OF LIFE
(Dir. Jorge Gutierrez, 2014) *


This Mexico-set CG-animated musical comedy adventure is a vast improvement over the animation studio Reel FX?s first feature, last year?s FREE BIRDS.

While that unfunny fiasco was about time-traveling turkeys, THE BOOK OF LIFE, the directorial debut of long-time television animator Jorge Gutierrez, has a lot more ambition by way of a fantastical storyline that pays vividly colorful respect to Mexican folklore. That Guillermo del Toro (PAN?S LABYRINTH, PACIFIC RIM) is one of the film?s producers gives it a bit of cinematic gravitas as well.

Unfortunately, it?s often clunky and cluttered, with hard-to-care-about experiences and loads of jokes that were met by silence at the screening I attended ? one packed with families with kids.

The characters are accurately described as wooden; through the framing device of a museum tour guide (voiced by Christina Applegate) telling the film?s tale to a group of snotty school children, the major players are represented by handcrafted wooden figures that come to life as marionettes without strings.

Via Applegate?s narration, we are taken to a Mexican landscape sometime in the unspecified past on the Dia de los Muertos (Day of the Dead) holiday, and introduced to a love triangle in which two young suitors ? the sensitive Manolo (Diego Luna) and the cocky warrior Joaquin (Channing Tatum, in his first animated feature) ? compete for the hand of the beautiful, free-spirited Maria (Zoe Saldana).

Watching from above, the squabbling husband-and-wife deities, La Muerta (Kate del Castillo), ruler of the Land of the Remembered, and Xibalba (Ron Perlman), ruler of the Land of the Forgotten, make a high-stakes wager on which suitor will marry Maria.

Manolo?s father (Hector Elizondo) wants him to carry on the family?s bullfighting tradition, but Manolo wants to be a musician. This gives the film the peg for both its transparent ?follow your dreams? moral and its musical numbers. Annoyingly interjected into the action is a bunch of Latin-tinged American pop songs, including Rod Stewart?s ?If You Think I?m Sexy,? Biz Markie?s ?Just a Friend? and even Radiohead?s ?Creep.?

There are some decent original songs written by Oscar-winning composers Paul Williams and Gustavo Santaolalla and performed by Luna and Saldana. One entitled ?I Love You Too Much? is catchy enough to be a hit. (It?s also a plus that they don?t make Tatum sing.)

Of course, every animated movie aimed at kids has to be in 3-D these days, and this one has more elements that can be enhanced by the format than most ? like a sequence involving Manolo running through a mega maze before speeding boulders crash down the corridors and crush him. But it made very little difference otherwise.

The presence of Ice Cube as a cuddly, goofy ancient god called ?The Candlemaker? is irksome. The rapper/actor?s performance is ?on,? but it seems a cynical piece of casting designed to up the hipness factor. Still, he drew some genuine laughs.

Despite the fact that a character dies, parents won?t have to worry about the film being dark or disturbing enough to give children nightmares. But on the flip side, THE BOOK OF LIFE isn?t magical or memorable enough to really resonate later, either.

* This review originally appeared in the October 16th, 2014 edition of the Raleigh News & Observer.

More later...

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/10/16/4235680_review-book-of-life-fantastical.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

Lucinda Williams? Pick For Film Acoustic: John Huston?s WISE BLOOD



Late last year when I heard about a new series starting up at the Carolina Theatre, programmed by The Modern School of Film, called ?Film Acoustic,? which pairs special guests with their favorite movies, I was very intrigued. Yet, I regretfully skipped the first installment in December with Wayne Coyne of the Flaming Lips presenting and discussing a 40th anniversary screening of Liliana Cavani?s THE NIGHT PORTER. Yeah, sure wish I?d gone to that.


So, the second in the series, I made sure I attended, especially when I heard that it would feature Grammy-winning singer/songwriter Lucinda Williams, one of my favorite artists. 


Williams? pick was WISE BLOOD, John Huston?s 1979 adaptation of Flannery O?Connor?s 1952 debut novel of the same name. It was announced that in addition to taking part in a talk about the movie with Modern School of Film founder and Duke graduate Robert Milazzo, Williams, unlike when Coyne appeared, would be playing a few songs after the screening. But the real kicker was that the event was, scheduled by happy accident, on Williams? 62nd Birthday! (Monday, January 26th)

The Birthday girl?s choice, the darkly humorous WISE BLOOD, is one of the weirdest in the iconic Huston?s filmography, far removed from the Humphrey Bogart classics he helmed (THE MALTESE FALCON, TREASURE OF SIERRE MADRE, KEY LARGO, THE AFRICAN QUEEN), and way less epic than the film that came before it, his 1975 Rudyard Kipling adaptation THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING, starring Sean Connery and Michael Caine.

Brad Dourif, best known for his roles in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO?S NEST, Deadwood, and, as Milazzo reminded us in a trivia question, as the voice of Chucky in the CHILD?S PLAY franchise, stars as Hazel Motes, a young Southern man who?s trying to establish what he calls the Church of Truth Without Christ.

Although referred to as the town Taulkinham (from the book), the film is clearly set in Macon, Georgia (the name Macon can be seen on buildings throughout). Dourif?s Motes travels to the area to set up his ministry, which is basically just him and his constantly breaking down Essex automobile, which he stands on the hood of to preach to people on the street.



Somewhere around the time that Motes finds himself a room at a boarding house, chosen because Harry Dean Stanton as a scam artist posing as a blind preacher and Amy Wright as his airheaded, horny daughter live there, I realized that I had seen this before. Or at least a large chunk of it, because a lot of its imagery, acting, and story points were very familiar to me. Ned Beatty?s role as Hoover Shoates (love that name), a boisterous guitar-playing rival to Motes, and an odd subplot involving Dan Shor as a needy, racist halfwit who steals a gorilla suit, rang bells of recognition in my mind too.

I believe I had happened upon it when devouring every movie I could as a kid watching cable in the mid ?80s. What I saw of WISE BLOOD back then had been locked away in some file in my mind, and this special screening rekindled those memories.

That was a cool thing to recall, and it enhanced this viewing quite a bit. But, of course, what really elevated the evening was Williams. Relaxed, drinking a glass of red wine, the woman who Time Magazine once called ?America?s best songwriter? came out to warm applause, and yelled birthday wishes, and seemed very satisfied with how the movie had been received by the audience there in Fletcher Hall that evening.

One of the key points of her discussion with moderator Milazzo was Williams? recently passed father, award winning Arkansas poet Miller Williams (1930-1915), who was a student of O?Connor?s.


Williams spoke about how her father?s agnosticism influenced understand what Motes meant by a church of Christ without Christ, and, alone with only her acoustic guitar, she performed two songs that were directly influenced by the film: ?Get Right With God,? from her 2001 album Essence; and ?Atonement,? from its 2003 follow-up Worlds Without Tears.

Williams? comments around those striking performances were priceless. On ?Get Right With God? winning a Grammy: ?It won Best Female Rock Vocal Performance, which doesn?t make any sense ? it wasn?t a rock song.? On the new solo arrangement of ?Attonement?: ?That sounded really cool, we might have to start doing it that way.?

Among some more lively discussion, which included her amusing recollection of meeting Bob Dylan for the first time, and some nifty audience Q & A, Williams also performed a blistering cover of Robert Johnson?s ?Stop Breakin? Down,? which appeared on her 1979 debut album Rambling, and a sweet version of ?Compassion,? adapted from one of her father?s poems, from her excellent 2014 album Down Where the Spirit Meets the Bone.

All in all, a great evening. Seeing WISE BLOOD, a pleasingly warped piece of Americana in the presence of one of its biggest fans, the wonderful Lucinda Williams, who sang its praises in both meanings of the phrase, on the occasion of her birthday, is something I?m sure I?ll never forget.


The next Film Acoustic, set for Monday, February 23rd, looks incredibly promising as well: Neko Case presents Alex Cox?s 1984 cult classic REPO MAN, with Very Special Guest Mike Nesmith. Being a big fan of Case, both solo and with the New Pornographers, and even a bigger fan of Nesmith, who executive produced REPO MAN, but, of course, is best known for being one of the Monkees, there?s no way I?m missing that.

More later...

Neko Case & Mike Nesmith Talk REPO MAN For Film Acoustic: Part 2



This is part 2 as the conversation between Neko Case and Mike Nesmith at the Carolina Theatre in Durham following a screening of REPO MAN earlier this week was so enjoyably rich with insights that I wanted to give it more space (click here for Part 1). For the second installment of the new series, Film Acoustic, the acclaimed singer/songwriter Case had chosen the 1984 cult classic, being one of her all-time favorites, to screen, and invited its executive producer, Nesmith, who you also may know from a little band he was in called the Monkees, to discuss it and other related topics with her.

Here, Nesmith speaks about the Monkees' sole film project, the possibility of a REPO MAN sequel, and whether or not popular singer/songwriter Jimmy Buffett had a cameo in the film.

Nesmith on HEAD, Bob Rafelson?s 1968 psychedelic masterpiece starring the Monkees: ?It?s actually a masterwork. And whose masterwork it is, is Jack Nicholson?s. When HEAD came about, it was, I don?t want to build too much ? take it on fact, that the movie Bob and Bert (Schneider) had decided to do, HEAD, as a kind of assisted suicide for the Monkees and they hired Jack to come in and help them. ?Cause they wanted to kill the monster. The monster had turned on them.

They had been praying for the little wooden boy to come to life and suddenly it did, and it scared the hell out of them so Geppetto was going to throw the marionette off the bridge. Well, okay off the air, but what do you do in that particular case with the music? What do you do with what that film is about to become? And Jack was able to bring the music into that film in such a way that it satisfied what everybody wanted out of that movie, that wanted anything out of the movie. And instead of killing the monster, it imprinted it forever on the history of film. And there it is, there it jolly well is.

Bob tells this story in the commentary of the movie?s Criterion release of HEAD where he says that Jack and him were sitting around loaded, and Bob gets dark and Jack said ?what?s going on?? ?I?m thinking about the blackest, darkest thing in the world.? And Jack said ?well, what would that be?? And Bob said ?Victor Mature?s hair.? And Jack said ?that?s it! The whole movie takes place in Victor Mature?s hair!? I thought Jack had one of the greatest dope riffs I ever heard!? But he took that and suddenly he made it all work around that music.?

Nesmith on his favorite line in REPO MAN: ??The life of REPO MAN is intense? is the fulcrum. That?s talking about intensity, it?s talking about what happens to you when you watch the movie ? it?s intense.?

On Alex Cox having the rights to the screenplay to REPO MAN: ?Now Alex has the right to make a sequel if he wants to.?

Milazzo: ?If he rang your phone and said ?hey, would you like to jump on this journey again with me??

Nesmith: ?No.? (audience laughs) I know, it sounded flip but no. It?s not because it was a bad experience because that?s not?I?m not sure that there is a sequel to REPO MAN. I think REPO MAN is a whole complete thing.?

Case: ?I?d be really sad if they made a sequel.?

Nesmith: ?Yeah, I?m kinda following you in on that. He wrote the sequel called ?Otto?s Hawaiian Holiday.? (audience laughs) Just as funny as you think it is.
?

Questions from the audience Q & A:

Audience member: ?The last scene, or near the end, with the guy that says ?I love my job? and they bring out a book, I think I remember that being a copy of ?Dianetics? but I didn?t quite pick it up in the movie??

Nesmith: ?I?m so glad you asked me that, because it?s one of the funniest jokes in the movie and nobody sees it!?

Audience member: ?And I just watched BATTLEFIELD EARTH yesterday!? (laughter)

Nesmith: ?You see, and this is an example, like how we got the generic food, they?re not gonna let us use Dianetics!? So Alex calls it ?Diaretics?!

Another audience member: ?Jimmy Buffet is credited as one of the blond agents, which one is he??

Milazzo: ?Where?s Jimmy Buffett in this film??

Case: ?Did they make that up??

Nesmith: ?No, no ? Jimmy was there.? (audience laughs)

Case: ?You guys planted this stuff like they?re little landmines that are just gonna keep going off for years and years.

Nesmith: ?Nobody planned it. They just fell off the truck and landed some place.?

Case: ?Jimmy Buffet?s on the lot.? (laughter) ?Do we have a size 44 blazer? Show Mr. Buffett in.? (more laughter)

Nesmith: ?That?s exactly what it was. That very thing. He and I were sort of friends, and hanging out, and was ?what are you doing?? ?Shooting REPO MAN,? ?oh I want to come to the set.? Alex said ?do you want to be in the movie?? and handed him a blazer and a pair of sunglasses. And he is part of the team when they set the body on fire that?s on the park bench, he?s one of those guys and if you look at it ? he?s standing by the back of the van. That?s Jimmy.?


Nesmith on the legacy of REPO MAN: ?Alex and Peter were all frustrated by the way that movie got distributed, and what happened to it in the public?s mind. The fact that it has gotten some traction, and there are people who love it, and people who really get it, is nourishing. 

Case: ?And I?m thinking that it probably made more money than GREYSTOKE: LEGEND OF TARZAN that came out that same year.? (audience laughs)

Nesmith: ?Actually, that?s my favorite movie, GREYSTOKE: LEGEND OF TARZAN.? (more laughter)

Milazzo: ?Goes without saying.? (even more laughter)


The next Film Acoustic is a real doozy: Frank Black from the Pixies Presents Terry Gilliam's BRAZIL, another favorite film of mine, on Thursday, March 19th. Tickets are on sale now.

More later...

Andrey Zvyagintsev?s bleak Russian tragedy LEVIATHAN


LEVIATHAN (Dir. Andrey Zvyagintsev, 2014)


While the 2015 awards season is technically over, it often lingers on in the form of foreign films that were nominated, but don?t get released in my area until after the Oscars are long over. 

Such is the case with Andrey Zvyagintsev?s bleak Russian tragedy LEVIATHAN opening today at the Raleigh Grande, which lost the Best Foreign Picture Academy Award to Pawel Pawlikowski?s striking Polish drama IDA.

Set in the coastal town of Pribrezhnv, whose beaches are strewn with the bones of whale carcasses (Leviathan means ?whale? in Modern Hebrew), while old rotting whaling ships clutter the sea, seemingly always under a dreary, overcast sky.

The grizzled Alexei Serebriakov plays Kolya, a stubborn, thick-headed auto mechanic who is caught up in a land dispute with the local government headed by the boorish, corrupt Mayor Vadim Sergeyich (Roman Madyanov).

Kolya, his second wife Lilya (Elena Lyadova), and teenage son Roma (Sergey Pokhodaev) are ordered to vacate the seaside property that's been in Koyla?s family for generations so he calls on the help of an ex-army friend Dmitri (Vladimir Vvitchenkov) who?s become a smooth, successful lawyer in Moscow.

Dimitri has compiled an incriminating file on the Mayor which he hopes will make him call off the eviction, but things get messy when Kolya is jailed for blowing up at the authorities and while he?s in the slammer, Dimitri sleeps with his wife.

The situation goes from horribly bad to wretchedly worse when Lilya commits suicide by jumping off a cliff into the ocean, and the police finger Koyla for her murder.

The story was inspired by the true story of Marvin Heemeyer, a Colorado man who made the news for fighting against the construction of concrete plant near his muffler shop, but, much like the Coen brothers? A SERIOUS MAN, it could very well be seen as a modern update of ?The Book of Job? ? an orthodox priest (Valeryi Grishko) even quotes from the scripture of Job to Koyla at one point.

As much as I admired the solid filmmaking framework of LEVIATHAN, I can?t say I?d really recommend it. I didn?t feel a connection to any of its characters who all appear to be vulgar, vodka-swigging caricatures, and the drawn-out length (141 minutes) is punishing at times. Maybe we?re supposed to feel like we?re being punished for enduring Koyla?s punishment.

Yet the film has instances of great effectiveness, especially visually (Mikhail Krichman?s cinematography stunningly captures the surrounding terrain), and it has considerable value as a vicious 
put-down of the Russian regime under Putin.

The exact opposite of a crowd pleaser (a crowd-downer?), LEVIATHAN is for folks who need no spoonful of sugar to help make their medicine go down. It?s just that the end results of this particular brand of meds rubbed me more wrong than right. 

More later...

Liam Neeson's Latest, The Run-Of-The-Mill RUN ALL NIGHT


Now playing at a multiplex near you:

RUN ALL NIGHT (Dir. Jaume Collet-Serra, 2015)



While watching this new crime thriller, I wondered: ?how much longer can Liam Neeson make these sort of action movies?? The next day I had my answer as it was reported that he told an interviewer that he?d be doing them for ?maybe two more years. If God spares me, and I?m healthy and stuff. But after that, I?ll stop [the action] I think.?

That sounds fair. I mean, he can crank out a couple more TAKENs in that time and still have time for a few more generic, run of the mill offerings like this one.

That?s not to say there?s no fun to be had with RUN ALL NIGHT, Neeson?s latest collaboration with Spanish director Collet-Serra, their third after UNKNOWN, and last year?s airplane thriller NON-STOP.

This time around, Neeson is a washed-up mob hit-man boozing it up in a Brooklyn club owned by his former boss (Ed Harris). Neeson has an estranged son, a limo driver played by Joel Kinnaman (The Killing, the ROBOCOP re-make), who wants nothing to do with his father. Harris has a son, Boyd Holbrook (WALK AMONG THE TOMBSTONES, GONE GIRL), an arrogant, entitled idiot who?s impatiently waiting to take over the family business.

The fateful night of the title, Kinnaman witnesses Holbrook shooting down a Albanian heroin dealer which, after a gun-fire filled chase through the dark neighborhood, leads to Neeson shooting down Holbrook. ?I just killed your boy, Shawn,? Neeson tells Harris on the phone. ?I had to.?

The scenario has similarities to JOHN WICK, in that the mob boss is actually sympathetic and understands what happened, but still needs to follow through and avenge his son. The intense yet weirdly warm exchanges between Neeson and Harris, particularly in a HEAT-styled meeting in a restaurant, are the film?s highlights.

There are some other mildly enjoyable elements in Common as a smooth dapper assassin on the trail of the father/son duo, and Vincent D'Onofrio as a frumpy cop (a guy as seemingly washed up as Neeson) set on finally busting Neeson after all these years. Sure, these characters are well worn clich?s but I still enjoyed the actors? presences.

Of course, Neeson, who amusingly is able to completely kick his alcoholism in a snap, and Kinnaman work out their differences in between shoot-outs, car chases, and brutal fist fights (my friend Fonvielle remarked that Collet-Serra and Neeson?s movies always have an intense confined-space bathroom fight), and the action moves from the city out to a house out in the country for the finale as it often does in these type things.

The stylish choice to have swooping cameras take us from aerial shots quickly down to ground level for transitional purposes is really better suited for high tech thrillers like ENEMY OF THE STATE or LIMITLESS. It's a cool looking device, but it doesn't feel in sync with this material.

There?s little depth in RUN ALL NIGHT, but it has more grit and less melodrama than Neeson/
Collet-Serra's previous effort NON-STOP. This entry is far from an embarrassment, and I'm certain a lot of action fans (and especially Neeson action fans) will find it quite serviceable.

So seeya next time Neeson, when his big old end to action countdown to 2017 continues.

More later...

The Splendid Soviet Hockey Doc RED ARMY


Opening today in the Triangle at The Raleigh Grande:

RED ARMY
 (Dir. Gabe Polsky, 2014)


I?m so not a sports guy, but I do enjoy a good sports documentary every now and then. So I must point out that Gabe Polsky?s RED ARMY, the writer/director?s second feature after his not bad drama THE MOTEL LIFE, is one of the best sports docs I?ve ever seen.

It tightly tells the story of the Soviet Union?s dominance of ice hockey, via their national team The Red Army Hockey Club, during the height of cold war tensions, and you don?t have to be a fan of hockey (or cold war tensions) to get swept up in its well paced narrative.

Largely anchored by an on camera interview with one of the key players, Slava Fetisov, multiple world championship winner and former Minister of Sport for Russia from 2002 to 2008, the film traces the history of the team, which was founded under Joseph Stalin in the '50s.

Through a poppy mixture of imagery that we be very familiar to fans of the FX program The Americans, including propaganda posters (with bright red coloring, of course), footage of oppressed Russian culture, and archival news reports, we are shown how in a demonstration of Soviet Superiority, Stalin would create athletes to dominate the West. In one bit of funny footage, a group of well groomed adolescent boys sings the chorus: ?Cowards don?t play hockey.?

Soviet Hockey Coach Anatoly Tarasov is credited for developing the program via lifting techniques from the Bolshoi Ballet and chess which as American journalist Lawrence Martin says made their passing game ?a intricate artistic tapesty which we didn't see over here.?

Newspaper headlines super-imposed on pertinent stock footage take us through the space and arms races and then we land in the '70s with a winning streak against Canada leading up to the team's first bout against America in two decades at the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid.

Prior to this, Tarasov is replaced by the chief of the KGB as coach by the volatile Viktor Tikhonov, the true villain of this film. When the Russians are defeated by the U.S. Olympic hockey team at Lake Placid, Tikhonov fired the veteran players, and rebuilds the team with Festisov and four other star players (including defenseman Alexei Kasatonov), who became known as ?The Russian Five.?

This unit dominated international competition in the '80s, winning gold medals in the 1984 and 1988 Olympics, but it was under a harsh regiment that had its members at a training camp for 11 months a year missing their families.

The financial collapse of the Soviet Union in the late '80s meant the end of the cold war, which meant as Bryant Gumbel says on an excerpted broadcast that ?Some of those world class atheletes that are in the Soviet Union will be allowed to come west, turn pro, and play for big rubles.?

A tug of war results over the NHL and the Red Army over Festisov wanting to leave the U.S.S.R. and play for the New Jersey Devils. Festisov's wife speaks about her husband being captured by police in Kiev, handcuffed to a car battery and beaten until late into the night over this conflict.

RED ARMY well illustrates the devotion of these men to the ideal of ?skillful and effective hockey? that Tarasov taught them, and how powerful friendships can be, even through the testy trials of the game that Fetisov and Kasatonov endure. It also lays plain how scary it was to live through this era in which the superegos of these world powers were so pitted against each other that such showdowns on the ice could really be game changers.

So again, take it from this non sports guy - this exceedingly entertaining and informative sports doc really did it for me.

More later...

The Pixies? Frank Black Blabs About BRAZIL For Film Acoustic



As I wrote in the Raleigh N & O, the third installment of the new series Film Acoustic was a real doozy: Frank Black of the iconic punk rock band the Pixies presenting Terry Gilliam's 1985 classic BRAZIL. The event went down last Thursday evening, March 19th, at the Carolina Theatre in Durham with a screening of the film, which I believe is the best film of the '80s, followed by a chat conducted by Modern School of Film founder and Duke graduate Robert Milazzo, a bit of audience Q & A, and solo acoustic performances of four songs (?Wave of Mutilation,? ?Monkey Gone To Heaven,? ?Los Angeles,? and ?All Around the World?).

Here are some highlights from the fine evening:

Milazzo's introduction: ?Terry Gilliam was asked ?what was your favorite review of BRAZIL?? from the critics because the critics loved this film. And he said ?it was from Salmon Rushdie. Salmon said ?we are all Brazilians. We are all strangers in a strange land.?? I offer you that bit of cultural anthropology because tonight?s guest studied for a moment or two cultural anthropology on his way to making music history. He told me last night though that the classes that he had the most fun were the cinema classes.

We?ll ask him if he feels that way in about an hour. Please welcome to the Modern School of Film, Professor Charles Thompson, everybody, Frank Black.?

(audience applause)

Frank Black: ?I should probably mention, I uh, made a bit of a popcorn mess by my seat.?

Milazzo: ?Really??

Black: ?I tried to get, I got, I threw half of it before it even started, but thank you for the popcorn. And uh, I didn?t know what to wear tonight ? ?cause my film professor Don Levine, who taught Avant Grade Film 302-B, used to always wear a black turtleneck, and a black jacket, black pants. And he had a black carrying bag also. And I didn?t have any turtlenecks. But uh, so I wore sweatpants because I wanted to be comfortable tonight, so uh, technically, these are pajamas actually. I wore my pajamas, and figured it was black, you know??

Miliazzo: ?The movie, as Jonathan Pryce says the movie is half real, half dreams, so its apropos that you would wear half real, half dreams?and clocks which I love, they tie the outfit together. Thank you man, thank you for being here.

Black: ?It?s hard to believe that the suits at Universal would?ve seen any cut of that film and said ?you know, we?ve got a couple of ideas we?d like to, uh?? (laughs) You know what I mean? It sort of seems like ?really?? How could you look at a single scene, you know, ?we like what you?re trying to do here but?? It?s sort of shocking but it?s not shocking, I don?t know. The artist is always right the tour manager told me and if, you know, you hire some guy to make a movie, the artist is all obviously making art. Just leave them alone, ?cause you don?t know and they do because they?re right.

Milazzo: ?When we invited you to screen whatever film you wanted to share, why did you pick BRAZIL??

Black: ?Well, it really is like a knee jerk kind of a choice ? I liked it! You know, when I first saw the movie, and I?ve seen it many times, and even though you could talk about this film and analyze it, intellectualize it, talk about it on a few different levels I suppose, basically I thought, I really liked it. I was really entertained by it, and I loved the film, all analysis aside. Every time I see it, I?m reminded of that. Now we can talk about it on other levels, but I liked it.?

Milazzo: ?When did you first see it? Did you see it in ?85??

Black: ?I saw it when it first came out, I didn?t know what cut it was. I don?t recall it having a completely hacked ending. I believe when it was shown on television, or something, they tried to end it on a happy note. Right? They escaped to the countryside, and lived happily ever after. There was some version of that I heard about, but I think when I saw it in theaters it had the more poignant ending.?

Milazzo: ?What were you doing in ?85??

Black: ?I was living in Boston, I had just dropped out of college, and I was starting a band with Kim Deal and Joey Santiago.?

Milazzo: ?That worked out.?

Black: ?Yeah, I was basically going to the movies. When I was in between jobs, I went to a lot of films. We rehearsed, we had our day jobs, but basically I went to the movies a lot. Sometimes we?d all go to the movies together as a band, ?cause it would be very important to me: ?you have to see this film that I?m really into!? You know, and I would drag them with me. They?d go along, and we had kind of a cinematic origin I suppose, you know, in at least that was what I was looking at more than music. Obviously, I loved Husker Du, and Peter, Paul and Mary, but, and I?d go see Husker Du when they came to town, but the art of film, also especially like this, you know, the way it?s supposed to be. We didn?t have computers or laptops or tablets or anything, and if you were a young broke musician you didn?t have TV or anything, so I?d go to the cinema a lot. And I always did then. As soon as I had enough money to go to the movies, I guess from my late teens or whatever, I went to the movies a lot.?

Milazzo: ?On a script level, Tom Stoppard wrote, and Gilliam credits him as giving the guts to the movie ? the Buttle/Tuttle, the bug falling into the thing ? and Charles McKeown, and just a bit of trivia, this is my back-up trivia question, he?s in LIFE OF BRIAN, he?s in the Biggus Dickus scene. The script of this is pretty sophisticated in a sense of how it balances politics, the politics of every day ? do you watch it on that level? Do you watch it on the sort of middle management, working in offices, I mean, it?s not been your life per say.?

Black: ?I mean, it echoes the past, it echoes the present, it amplifies the future. I mean, it?s so incredibly apropos to any conversation, whether it?s today or whether it was 1985 when they made it. Or, I imagine, in the future, where it will all make a lot of sense.?

Milazzo: ?Your son is right.?

Black: ?Without getting into any kind of specifics, you know, bombs, control, misidentification, homogenization, pasteurization, whatever, the machinery ? where does one begin? It?s all there.?

Milazzo: ?One of the cool things, and you said it so well, and it?s even a more intelligent perspective, this film does better watching it more times, maybe in a way, watching it again here ? the samurai is made out of computer parts. You can only watch it if you scrutinize the movie. This whole retro-fitting thing ? he admits he sort of got it from Ridley Scott and Blade Runner, but this retro-fitting was in.?

Black: ?The Samurai I find particularly beautiful. When he?s defeated the first time by Sam, and the flames from the escaping gas coming out of him, something about it is really beautiful and evil and industrial??

Milazzo: ?And analog! You know, it?s like the movie is homemade in a sense. When you see Ian Holm with his face and those arms??

On the cast:

Black: ?I love Ian Holm, his tension, his pretending his hand?s broken?the casting is so incredible in this film?Jim Broadbent as the plastic surgeon ?cut cut, snip snip,? with his hair and everything, just beautiful.?

Milazzo: ?We talked about the performances a lot yesterday ? Kim Griest who takes a bad rap in a way is perfect, I mean, the way the casting of that is perfect.?

Black: ?One of the things I really liked about it, it involves her character of course, is just the idea of love. There?s this old school romantic thing where he?s just obsessed with this person. And he?s searching for this person, because he loves them?and that?s it. It?s so romantic, and he?s this dorky nervous nellie guy with all this existential ennui and he doesn?t know what he wants ? ?I want her, I think!? And it reminds me of when I first had a romantic crush when I was young. 

You know, that?s what you would fantasize about, like the backdrop of this film it?s like it?s all gone wrong, the world?s gone wrong, and I wonder what would it be like if there was an apocalyptic war and the world as we know it is falling apart, ?I?ll go to her house, to her parent?s house and I?ll go get her!? And we?ll get on a train, or a horse (laughs). We?ll escape, we?ll get out to the countryside just like at the end there. I guess, again there, the influence of BLADE RUNNER, I don?t know. Finally escape the grimy dark urban kind of tubular life that they lived, and they finally make it out to the countryside of the green, there?s the English countryside, much like the end of BLADE RUNNER. Finally we get out of Los Angeles where we can breathe! (Takes a big breath)

On the ending:


Black: ?That?s the noir ending, you know it?s like ?nope!? It isn?t alright! Nope! Death! No, it?s over. The bad guys win. Of course, that?s the ending you want. That?s the ending that?s gonna ?cause people to talk about it. We don?t talk about happy endings because, we forget them.?

On ?Debaser,? which was inspired by Luis Bu?uel?s 1929 surreal silent film collaboration with Salvador Dali, UN CHIEN ANDALOU:

Milazzo: ?What was the line between watching the film, 
UN CHIEN ANDALOU, and writing ?Debaser,? putting it out into the world, what was the creative chronology??

Black: ?I don?t really know, but I think the way I used to write songs at that time was that I?d use language in a kind of jabberwocky kind of way. I would find syllables and combinations of consonants and vowels that I liked the sound of them. So maybe they?d form a word I was familiar with and maybe they didn?t, but it would begin to take form that way. And then maybe I could, it would ascend into an actual intelligible word, and then maybe that intelligible word might inform the rest of the text, or the lyric, you know? So, it wasn?t like I had the need to write a song that was basically the Cliff?s Notes, sort of a pop song Cliff?s Notes version of UN CHIEN ANDALOU. 


A song is such a shrunk down thing, there?s a universe of ideas but you?ve only got (sings out a bit of melody made up of nonsense sounds) ? that?s it! That?s all you?ve got, and so how are you gonna get all this information in? I just took some of the language from my interpretation of the film, and I just, I don?t want to say it?s a hack job! 

But I kind of used something that I liked, you know, it wasn?t like I was saying anything. Other than, to quote Serge Gainsbourg: ?I am a surrealist!? So it was my way of saying ?I am a surrealist too!? and ?I?m borrowing your movies for my song!? That?s a French accent, right??

On 
?In Heaven,? a cover of a song from the ERASERHEAD soundtrack:

Milazzo: ?Another song, ?The Lady in The Radiator? song, ?In Heaven,? which is an ERASERHEAD draw. Talk about that, watching ERASERHEAD conjuring that song. Do you recall that process??

Black: ?You brought it up, that is was the theme song to David Lynch?s ERASERHEAD, it was written, the lyric is by David Lynch actually, but the music is by a guy named Peter Ivers, and, of course, when I was a teenager I saw the film and I liked it, and we were a band playing nightclubs, we were an artsy fartsy band, so we did our loud version of that kinda simple song, and I thought we were so cool, but I found out that every metropolis on the planet has a band that has that song in their repertoire so we weren?t the only ones.?

On the use of the Pixies' 
?Where Is My Mind?in David Fincher's 1999 cult classic FIGHT CLUB:

Black: ?It was nice that our song was in it, but I was kind of more caught up in my cinema experience so I think I was able to compartmentalize it. I didn?t jump up and go ?that?s me!? But I mean, you know, I got a grand out of it, but I was engaged in the film. When it happened it washed over me like everybody else. It?s a great moment in the film, because it?s a great moment in the film not because of the song. The song works, but I think a lot of songs could?ve worked in that same spot. But he picked the right kind of song, I suppose, for his montage.?

On being up for a role in Fincher's ZODIAC

Black: ?You know, uh, David Fincher was making the ZODIAC movie, and he wanted me to play the Zodiac killer, because I bore a certain physical resemblance.?

Milazzo: ?Wow! That?s cool, man.?

Black: ?And so he sent me part of the script and some other materials, you know so I could get all Robert De Niro and really get into my role ? it was a little freaky, but, you know, I bought some combat boots that the guy was fond of, and tried to, you know, I went to an acting coach, we talked for a few minutes. And they know I?m not an actor and they weren?t trying to put a lot of pressure on me, but I sat there with him and his producer, and I was literally like, you know, Don Knotts, I was just like (makes unintelligible speech) ? I was just reading off a page and I couldn?t even like, it was just so hard. It was so hard to act, to even just read, to put, to get any kind of connection to the drama, even in the most casual setting? ?It?s okay, it?s alright , Charles? I said, I literally couldn?t even talk. And they were ?Thank you very much,? and I never heard from them again.?

The next installment of Film Acoustic, on Monday, April 13th, looks pretty damn interesting too: Patterson Hood of the Drive By Truckers screens Sidney Lumet's 1976 classic NETWORK. Tickets are on sale now.

More later...