Showing posts with label Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crime. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

The Drop

***DISCLAIMER*** The following review is entirely my opinion. If you comment (which I encourage you to do) be respectful. If you don't agree with my opinion, that's fine. To each their own. These reviews are not meant to be statements of facts or endorsements, I am just sharing my opinions and my perspective when watching the film and is not meant to reflect how these films should be viewed. Finally, the reviews are given on a scale of 0-5. 0, of course, being unwatchable. 1, being terrible. 2, being not great. 3, being okay. 4, being great and 5, being epic! And if you enjoy these reviews feel free to share them and follow the blog or follow me on Twitter (@RevRonster) for links to my reviews and the occasional live-Tweet session of the movie I'm watching! So...this movie isn't about the bass drop on a dubstep track?  Huh.




The Drop ? 4 out of 5


James Gandolfini was, and will forever be remembered, as a fantastic actor.  Forgetting for a moment how amazing he was to watch as the iconic Tony Soprano, the man commanded attention and it wasn?t unheard of him to steal the film and demand all the attention?sometimes this worked when he ended up being the only good thing about some films.  Sadly, this is the last of the films he worked on when he passed and is the last billing his name saw in his talented life.  However, his is starring with Tom Hardy?so, that?s a pretty epic combination to end on, in my opinion.
That's a lot of talent crammed into one tight corner.



Bob (Tom Hardy) is a quiet and simple man who works for a drop bar?a bar that is a point of convergence for money from illicit gains and is picked up there by some members of a organized crime syndicate?and this bar was once the property of Cousin Marv (James Gandolfini)?he?s owns it now in name only as the mobsters are the true owners now.  One day, the bar gets robbed?which, in an of itself, is a stupid move but there seems to be a whole lot more to the robbery than a couple of simple thugs trying to get some beer money.  While this happens, Bob finds himself connecting with a local girl (Noomi Rapace) over an abandoned dog he found.  And, as strange as it all seems, this event has plenty to do with the robbery that took place?
Ever since Prometheus, Rapace is always on the lookout for angry fanboys.

I really enjoy Tom Hardy and I already gave a gushing insight to how I feel about the late great Gandolfini in the opening paragraph, so when these two meet in a single film, I?m pretty much sold.  Don?t bother showing me a trailer, just give me a quick summary of what it is about?hell, lie to me what it is about?and I?ll watch the damn thing.  And, I have to say, The Drop is a great crime drama with some absolutely tremendous performances.
Man, that mobster can tie the fuck out of tie.  That knot is flawless.


The story to The Drop isn?t too complicated but it was really good at keeping me glued to the screen.  At first, the whole aspect of Bob finding a dog and using it to connect with Noomi Rapace?s character sorta feels out of place and I started to wonder what exactly the dog and Rapace?s character played.  Without spoiling anything (we know how the internet hates spoilers), they in fact play a very important role and all the characters and their plotlines connect at the end but, more importantly, was how this element played on the themes of the film?themes like keeping secrets and hidden pasts.
Garbage dogs...so clich?.


Bob is a very quiet, unassuming character who, a little bit, comes off a little simple.  However, the ending shows he is a lot more?after all, mysterious pasts are the name of the game in this film.  One of the strongest aspects in the story was seeing how Nadia (Rapace) dealt with when she learned what Bob is exactly capable of.  This ends up playing very well with the kindness he shows the dog and what he will do to protect both the dog and Nadia.  Bob?s loyalty is another theme the film showcases and it showcases it very well.
It looks like her sweater is trying to quietly sneak away.


And since I?m talking about Bob, I?ll talk about Tom Hardy?s performance.  Hardy is an actor that, no matter what project he is on, I will go out of my way to watch said project.  Every film I watch him in I praise his seamless talent and the way he is able to absolutely submerge himself into the character he is playing and, once again, he has surprised me with how talented he is.  Like I said, Bob seems like a simple character who might not have all the bulbs on his Christmas light string all lit up and it was such a stark contrast to the strong characters that I?m quick to think of when I think of Hardy (I?ll be honest, I think Bane, Bronson, his charismatic performance in Inception, and his role in Warrior first with Hardy before I think about him in something like Locke?even though I loved Locke).  And since he is so ridiculously talented, Hardy pulls this off and I forget that one time he was beating the shit out of Batman while talking in a voice I can?t help but imitate to total strangers.
"What are you thinking about?"
"Oh, nothing.  Just breaking the Batman and stuff."


Honestly, all the performances in the film were great and that?s not really a surprise considering the cast.  Rapace plays tremendously well in her scenes with Hardy and Gandolfini is, once again, awesome to watch.  Cousin Marv might not be as unique as the character of Bob and is, usually, a man of few words, Gandolfini makes him a character to watch because the dude could speak volumes without saying a single goddamn word.  The defeat that Marv feels for being a lackey to the mob in a bar that was once his is palpable and Gandolfini represents in in spades.  This also leads to a great monologue from the man where he rants about how he was once respected and feared and now he?s nothing.  While this role won?t be as memorable to me as some of his other later roles (like his great performance in the romcom Enough Said) it?s still a damn fine role to be credited as your final appearance.  Rest in peace, good sir!
Good night, sweet prince.


The Drop isn?t flashy, the reveal isn?t some jaw-dropping twist, and the film doesn?t have much replay value beyond a viewing here and there but the film has a great, well executed story, interesting characters, and tremendous acting.

Horrible Bosses 2

***DISCLAIMER*** The following review is entirely my opinion. If you comment (which I encourage you to do) be respectful. If you don't agree with my opinion, that's fine. To each their own. These reviews are not meant to be statements of facts or endorsements, I am just sharing my opinions and my perspective when watching the film and is not meant to reflect how these films should be viewed. Finally, the reviews are given on a scale of 0-5. 0, of course, being unwatchable. 1, being terrible. 2, being not great. 3, being okay. 4, being great and 5, being epic! And if you enjoy these reviews feel free to share them and follow the blog or follow me on Twitter (@RevRonster) for links to my reviews and the occasional live-Tweet session of the movie I'm watching! It could have been worse...it could have been a Hangover sequel.




Horrible Bosses 2 ? 4 out of 5


I really enjoyed the first Horrible Bosses film. We?ve all had a terrible boss that we wouldn?t have shed a single tear if a rabid bear with an Uzi suddenly busted into the office and riddled his body with bullets and this film helped us with that fantasy?well, not the very specific one I mentioned but more of the worker killing the boss and fulfilling the very thing Homer Simpson once called the American Dream. When I saw the trailer for its sequel, I laughed quite a bit and was a little bit excited to see the trio of Jason Bateman, Jason Sudeikis, and Charlie Day get into some more shenanigans?also, this film allows me to use the word "shenanigans."

And the shenanigans start!



Nick (Bateman), Kurt (Sudeikis), and Dale (Day) are in business for themselves and they create a device called the "Shower Buddy." They soon find themselves doing business with some investors named Bert Hanson (Christoph Waltz) and his son Rex (Chris Pine). After Bert screws them over in order to bankrupt them and buy the company when its in foreclosure, the group meets with their old buddy Motherfucker Jones (Jamie Foxx) and come up with a plan to kidnap Rex and have Bert pay a ransom?and said ransom will be used to get their company back in good graces. The group soon see a hiccup?Rex is willing to play along because he feels his father doesn?t respect or love him.


Movies have taught me that crime leads to fun and hilarity!


Hmmm...I think I'll start calling myself Motherfucker
Ron.
The critics and audiences were mixed on Horrible Bosses 2 but I really enjoyed this one. In fact, I had just as much fun with this one as I did the first one. I?m a sucker for a dark comedy and the more inappropriate they get, the more likely I will find it hilarious (of course, it still has to be a joke?just doing offensive things for the sake of being offensive isn?t actually humor). There were some very definite risqu? jokes going on in this film that easily rode the line of being funny and offensive but I never had a problem with any of them and was cracking up quite a bit.


The longer you stare at Charlie Day, the harder you'll laugh.


I won?t deny the chemistry that Bateman, Sudeikis, and Day all have as a unit or the chemistry they have with the rest of the cast?especially Pine, Aniston, Spacey and Foxx. This chemistry seen throughout the cast is what made so much of the humor work for me and made the near two hour running length not seem like overkill. The film could have easily started to drag but the characters and the story mixed so well with the darker humor that I was entertained the whole time.


Look at all those shenanigans...


The scenes may be short but the laughs they gave me
went well into the night...the neighbors weren't happy.
The cast in the film are all really good?I already mentioned their chemistry but each player was able to hold their own and bring it up a notch with the humor. Kevin Spacey returns and has a small role but his few scenes are memorable as hell. Jennifer Aniston continues to be the sexed up harlot of the previous film but is able to take it even further and really bring the shock factor of hearing some truly cheek-blushing things from one of America?s Sweethearts. It was also really nice to see more Motherfucker Jones because he was, without a doubt, one of my top highlights from the first film. However, one actor that really stole the show for me was Chris Pine.


Never in my life did I ever think I would hear Rachel says what she says in these films.


I had no real expectations for Pine because I?m not the biggest fan of him. I don?t think he?s a bad actor, I just haven?t really seen him in many films where I felt he was perfect for the role. However, for his role as Rex Hanson, I was beyond entertained. Pine not only felt right at home with the group of Bateman, Sudeikis, and Day but he was proving that he wasn?t just there to be someone who tags along but showed he could keep up and even steal several scenes with his delivery. The character of Rex has a bit of complexity to him and he develops quite a bit through the story and Pine was perfectly showcasing the changes without it ever feeling like a brand new character showed up and, more importantly, was hilarious the entire way. To put it simple: Pine nailed this character and all of his attributes, development and humor perfectly!


His performance made me PINE for more of his character!


I am truly, deeply sorry for that pun.


One thing however that felt extremely lacking in the film was the character played by Christoph Waltz. While it?s obvious who he is and the purpose he plays, I felt we never got to see enough of him and that having someone as ridiculously talented as Waltz go underuse was a bit of a crime. Granted, the film is already a bit longer than a lot of shenanigan-based comedies are and showing more of Bert Hanson and seeing some more development about him and his relationship with his son might have slowed the film down or make it too long, it still would have been nice to see some more Waltz added to the story and not regulate him as a metaphoric set piece or plot device.


One shouldn't waste Waltz.


More shenanigans!
Even with the consensus of Horrible Bosses 2 being deeply mixed, I really enjoyed this film and had a blast watching it. I loved how the story didn?t feel like it was trying to completely redo what was already done and I think all the characters are very amusing and played excellently by the cast. Some of the humor might be a tad offensive to some viewers but, to me, I felt it was hysterical and was laughing quite a bit. Sequels are always difficult to do but, in my opinion, I felt this one work exceptionally well.

Vulgar

***DISCLAIMER*** The following review is entirely my opinion. If you comment (which I encourage you to do) be respectful. If you don't agree with my opinion, that's fine. To each their own. These reviews are not meant to be statements of facts or endorsements, I am just sharing my opinions and my perspective when watching the film and is not meant to reflect how these films should be viewed. Finally, the reviews are given on a scale of 0-5. 0, of course, being unwatchable. 1, being terrible. 2, being not great. 3, being okay. 4, being great and 5, being epic! And if you enjoy these reviews feel free to share them and follow the blog or follow me on Twitter (@RevRonster) for links to my reviews and the occasional live-Tweet session of the movie I'm watching! If you see the movie, you would think the title is describing the quality of the film.



Vulgar ? 1 out of 5


Kevin Smith and his View Askew Productions have a legion of fans. With this production company, the man has been involved with the creation of films that have become pop cultural icons and have hit home with lots of people and have remained precious to them. Hell, I like Smith but will admit that I can no longer watch a lot of his films in the View Askewniverse. Thanks to Comedy Central playing Dogma a million times a week while I was in college, I can no longer watch that film and Clerks, its sequel, Mallrats, and Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back have worn thin for me and are no longer funny. While that sounds like I?m being negative, it?s really just my experience with these films.  I simple don't find them amusing anymore.  I actually have a great deal of respect for Smith because he has the means to make his creative dreams come true and not a lot of creative types have that opportunity. For example, I hated Tusk but I was damn impressed that Smith had the ability to make his idea a reality. But enough talking about Smith because this film wasn?t made by him, only produced. This one, instead, was written and directed by his friend Steve Dave Bryan Johnson?or, as some might know him as, the man with the epic beard on Comic Book Men.

Here's what Johnson looked like 14 years ago...the younger days of his
epic beard.



Vulgar tells the story of the mascot to View Askew Productions. Will Carlson (Brian O?Halloran) is a man struggling through life. His career is being Flappy the Clown and performing at kid?s parties but the problem is that it doesn?t pay the bills, as so pointed out by his best friend Syd (Johnson). Carlson eventually gets the idea that he should take Flappy and make him more adult oriented and hire this new clown, called Vulgar, out to bachelor parties for prank purposes. After putting an ad in the paper (it?s like Craigslist, kids, but made from dead trees), a man named Ed Fanelli (Jerry Lewkowitz) hires Vulgar but Carlson soon finds terror when Ed and his two sons; Frankie (Ethan Suplee) and Gino (Matthew Maher), viciously attack, drug, and rape him. Carlson tries to put the pieces of his life back in order and, by accident, becomes a hero after he saves the life of a little girl. Carlson, as Flappy (not Vulgar), is thrown into the spotlight and it ends up giving Flappy a career where he gets a successful kid?s show. However, Carlson?s past catches up when Ed Fanelli sees his familiar face and wants money in exchange for not releasing the video of the assault?


Dammit, why did I include this screencap?


Looks like a Richard Marx video.
Overall, I didn?t really care for this film. Even with the disturbing nature of the story, it held some potential but was held back by a lot of factors. The first one was the piss-poor quality of the filmmaking. The lighting is awful, the video quality is messy and muddled, and the editing is sloppy. I understand the drawbacks of small budgets but when the lighting is so bad that characters are entire consumed by shadows that you can't see them during intense sequences, it ends up hurting the overall story telling and it quickly threw me out of the tale.


Seriously, has there ever been a person who wasn't already a clown that actually
liked clowns?


The biggest problem I had with the film was the acting from Brian O?Halloran. I?ll be honest, and I know this will piss off the Smith fans who look at Clerks like it is some sort of holy item, I don?t think O?Halloran is a good actor. He seemed okay for Clerks and its sequel but, aside from that, I see a guy who has one setting and it?s the one he uses in the iconic first film of Kevin Smith. Will Carlson comes off not too much different from all the other characters in the View Askewniverse and it made the film a bit distracting to me. Granted, there were times when his pain after his assault was done quite well but the rest of the time, he comes off no different than the guy who is, essentially, the tired joke of how he?s not suppose to be here today and the world won?t stop shitting on him.


O'Halloran just looks like an evil clown when the make-up comes off.


Another issue that became really distracting was the sense that Bryan Johnson was trying really hard to imitate the writing style of Kevin Smith. Very often, dialogue (and this is usually only seen during the scenes Johnson is in) comes off unnatural and like it is trying to recreate the back-and-forth seen in films like Clerks, Mallrats, and Chasing Amy. While Smith can make this dialogue?which is wholly unnatural but often amusing and witty?actually work. Johnson, on the other hand, didn?t seem to have that under control and too much of the dialogue comes off laughably (or uncomfortably) unrealistic. This is extremely evident after Carlson is attacked and violated and is being visited by Syd. The back-and-forth the two have doesn?t sound like something that would really be exchanged and, rather, sounds like some faux-intellectual dribble that a first year film student would write and think he created the smartest sounding thing in the world. It ended up taking the horrific event that happened to Carlson and downplay it, making it impossible to sympathize with the character.


Remember when the internet went crazy because Smith shaved his beard and
news sites reported it like it was real news?  Sometimes the internet has too much
time on its hands.


While many might find the story to be disgusting and disturbing, I actually found a lot of potential in it. What happens to Carlson is primed for unique drama that is emitting from a male perspective that is, in this particular case, not seen in the world of film. The film probably could have been interesting alongside its disturbing side if the script was tweaked but the end result is just a floundering tale that can?t figure out if it wants to be a comedy, drama, a crime thriller, or even a different version of Death Wish or I Spit On Your Grave (but with a clown).


Seriously, fuck everything about clowns.


Overall, I just didn?t care for Vulgar. The story was a mess that couldn?t figure out if it was a comedy or something darker, the lead is filled by a man who is trying to play a completely different role and is forcefully squeezing it into a role it wasn?t meant for, and the film just looks awful. The whole thing felt muddled and unclear over what it wants to be and it results in a film that is hard to watch and even harder to really engage in.

Friday, 23 October 2015

Movie Review: Ghanchakkar..ne kuch khaas nahi ghumaya




After creating unexpected magic at the box office with The Dirty Picture the unlikely hit combination of Emraan Hashmi and Vidya Balan came together for what sounded like a situational comedy with noir elements, with Ghanchakkar. With a trailer that gives away practically the entire plot, one still ventured to the theater hoping that there was more to this story than meets the eye. Unfortunately, there isn?t

First the good part. Let?s start with background score. Surprised? Well, I was too, but a large part of what makes this movie watchable is the near perfect background score that Amit Trivedi puts in place to make even the dull moments come alive with anticipation. That, and the unique and promising premise this movie starts with are its real heroes. Where the train goes off-track is when the director, quite evidently, wondered what to do after such a promising start. He could?ve taken it in 15 different directions; instead he chose to take it in ? well, none (other than perhaps towards the climax but we can?t talk about that for obvious reasons)

As for the comedy. Well, it?s the subtle stuff that bring the real guffaws rather than the obvious efforts to make you laugh..the priceless dinner table moments after the hilarious bank scene to count a few. Emraan Hashmi?s rather confused character seemingly had potential to make you laugh too but considering its Hashmi doing the delivery, the humor element dries up considerably. I am also not sure why the script required a Punjaban housewife and am even more perplexed why Balan was chosen for such a role. While her Punjabi dialogues come in with spot on accent and fervour, her other dialogues seem far too forced and lack the natural Punjabi touch. To make matters worse her character, which had the potential to be the most complex isn?t really so; an actress of Vidya Balan?s calibre ought to have been given a lot more scope and this character even had the potential.

The writing is a real let-down ? even when someone like Rajesh Sharma can?t make you laugh much with his one ? liners, its clear that content must take the blame. This is even more obvious, down the line, where you?ll hear the main characters scream and shout the same dialogues you could swear you heard just 10 minutes ago and this happens multiple times. The movie relies more on frequent swear words than on good dialogue to interest its audience and for the most part ? it doesn?t work

A big problem for Ghanchakkar is that its really not sure what it wants to be ? an in your face comedy, a subtle and quirky satire or a crime thriller. By trying to be all three it ends up being neither. To make matters worse, Ghanchakkar is at least half an hour too long and could?ve been a lot more snappier ? thereby becoming a more engaging watch

As it stands then, Ghanchakkar's premise promised a lot but its execution delivers little ? had hoped for better when I walked into the hall.

Movie Review: Madras Caf?..serves realistic gritty fare



Madras Caf?, a one of a kind film from Bollywood, is a gritty, realistic, crime thriller ? that isn?t looking at charming its audience. It wants the story told ? the way it deserved to be told, without any departures from reality to make it more palatable. So there are no sudden induced plot twists. The drama unfolds right before your eyes and if you are able to spot it, you would know exactly who the mole is much ahead in the story, if not why. It tells the story from the eyes of its main sufferer and protagonist, Major Vikram (John Abraham) and never once, does the plot stretch reality to make us, the audience, fall in love with or connect with its hero.

Madras Caf? is not for thrill seekers or aficionados of traditional high octane action. There isn?t a single comic line across the roughly 2 and a half hours that it runs for. The drama is brutal, bloody and graphic. The narration is done in a dull, lifeless manner ? a voice that has already lost hope and is merely going through the motions from a formality perspective. Yet, given the context, this is exactly the way such a movie ought to be made

Making such a movie is about walking a tightrope ? how much to stick to the main plot and whether to maintain any sway for those thrilling moments that would make it a commercial success. Madras Caf??s tightrope walker, Shoojit Sircar, is a seasoned professional. He walks the rope, dead in the center and gives us a realistic, crime drama without any frills whatsoever. Does it work? Let?s just say it won?t for all and sundry.  There are some of us who might get bored or irritated with the bland nature of plot development, where things just happen without all the hoopla we are, by now, accustomed to. But that?s the way it is, with Madras Caf?

What it does do right and that too, to a large extent, is offer a glimpse of exactly what could have gone down before the assassination that shocked the country and the world. How events could have unfolded, in parallel and how unglamorously some people would have struggled to make sense of the snippets of messages coming through, getting caught up in a whorl of politics, power games and frame-ups. John Abraham does a good job of portraying his character, though, if he emoted a touch better, it could have added some life to the story telling. Nargis Fakhri?s role is short and functional ? again a huge departure from traditional Bollywood fare

I tried to figure out what kind of movie I had seen once I exited the hall. Without much success, I settled for a pot pourri of Blood Diamond, Black Friday and Zero Dark Thirty minus the thrills in all three. Madras Caf? serves anything but ordinary fare. Yet its gonna be an acquired taste; may not feel great at the first bite. Still, I?d suggest you give it a shot as such cinema is a rare event in Bollywood.