Showing posts with label Dwayne Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dwayne Johnson. Show all posts

Thursday, 26 November 2015

Furious 7

***DISCLAIMER*** The following review is entirely my opinion. If you comment (which I encourage you to do) be respectful. If you don't agree with my opinion (or other commenters), that's fine. To each their own. These reviews are not meant to be statements of facts or endorsements, I am just sharing my opinions and my perspective when watching the film and is not meant to reflect how these films should be viewed. Finally, the reviews are given on a scale of 0-5. 0, of course, being unwatchable. 1, being terrible. 2, being not great. 3, being okay. 4, being great and 5, being epic! And if you enjoy these reviews feel free to share them and follow the blog or follow me on Twitter (@RevRonster) for links to my reviews and the occasional live-Tweet session of the movie I'm watching!  I'm not a car guy but I sure do love the roar of the engines and the fast action these films provide.



Furious 7 ? 4 out of 5

I guess you can say that the Fast and the Furious franchise is a guilty pleasure of mine but I?ve recently decided to stop using that term.  There?s no reason why something you enjoy should make you feel guilty.  If something entertains you?in any way, shape or form?then enjoy the hell out of it and don?t call it a guilty pleasure.  For example, I think the Final Destination films are stupid but stupidly fun and I get entertainment from that.  In a similar fashion, I openly admit that the Fast films are popcorn action spectacles filled with fast cars, insane action and gratuitous amounts of scantily clad ladies always making their way into shots but I find them fun for that.  In all honesty, the only film in the series I didn?t really care for was the second one but this one?Furious 7?was the most insane of all the films they?ve done so far and, you know what?  It was a goddamn blast!!!  (That?s right, a ?blast? with three freakin? exclamation points.)

Young lady, that skirt is way too short.  You are not going out dressed like that.

He's on the phone trying to get Liam Neeson to be
in the next film.
After leaving Owen Shaw (Luke Evans) in a broken state in the last film, Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel) and Brian O?Conner (Paul Walker) seem like they are going to settle into a relatively normal life.  However, Shaw?s brother Deckard (Jason Statham) is out for revenge.  After killing Han (Sung Kang)?the events seen in Tokyo Drift?and severely injuring Agent Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson), he sets his sights on taking out Dom and his crew.  However, a mysterious man calling himself Mr. Nobody (Kurt Russell) gets Dom and Brian?s team; Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), Roman (Tyrese Gibson) and Tej (Ludacris), and offers them a unique opportunity.  A terrorist by the name of Jakande (Djimon Housou) is after a super computer program called The God?s Eye and he kidnaps a hacker named Ramsey (Nathalie Emmanuel) to help him use it.  If Dom, Brian and the gang can get The God?s Eye, Mr. Nobody?s strike team will help them take out Deckard.

Hmm, Diesel is picking up a car.  You know what?  Fuck it.  At this point, these
characters are basically superheroes.

You can hate these films all you want but you gotta hand
it to the series for the stunts they do.
Furious 7 is basically a balls-to-the-walls, non-stop, adrenaline-laced, nitrous oxide-boosted thrill ride of popcorn action and spectacle that is hurled at your face with absolutely no fucks given?and I loved every goddamn second of it.  Haters of this franchise like to thumb their noses at the films and act like their intelligence is automatically higher because they don?t like it.  Over and over again I?ve been called stupid because I want to veg out and enjoy a wild action film like this once and awhile but one thing they never take into consideration is the powers behind these films are anything but lacking in intelligence.  The films wouldn?t be making the money and be one of the biggest franchises out there if they weren?t completely immersed in the psyches of their target demographic.  The series is also smart in the fact that it keeps trying to remain fresh.  When you compare this outing to the first film, there?s almost like they are from two different genres.  The films are now heist/crime thrillers and no longer racing films with a hint of crime action thrown in.  This feature continues with the new direction the franchise went and having Dom and the gang as basically vigilante superheroes in supped up cars continues to prove to be a working formula.  The action may be mindless but the production behind sure know what the fuck they are doing.

Sometimes I just want mindless explosions instead of deep characters and
rich dialogue.

Every Furious film has offered up sweet fast-pace action and this one is definitely no exception.  In fact, the action that comes into play might be some of the best and most excitingly constructed action I?ve seen.  Whether it?s the intense rescue of Ramsey from the hands of Jakande?s right hand man played by Tony Jaa or the all-out war that explodes across the scene and culminates in The Rock blasting every living thing to hell with a BFG, the action is blood-pumping, energetic and flippin? exciting.  It was an odd choice to have horror director James Wan take on a Fast film but he not only proved that he was up to the challenge but the way he constructed every shot and the sweeping, dynamic camera movements during the fun that he proved to be an extremely versatile director and that the depths of his talent clearly have no bottom.

For example, this scene in a rolling bus between Paul Walker and Tony Jaa
was extra amazing, awesome and exciting.

It would have been even cooler if he was playing
Jack Burton.
One thing that kinda surprised me a bit was with the cast.  It?s already freaking cool as shit that Kurt Russell was brought on because that man is cooler than cool and has a resume made up of some of my all-time favorite films.  Additionally, I really enjoyed Jason Statham as Deckard Shaw.  I?m honestly not the biggest fan of Statham?I don?t care for the Transporter films or the Expendable movies?but in the right role in the right film, I really enjoy the man and he was a perfect antagonist for the story.  Additionally, I was a little surprised by how much I enjoyed Tyrese Gibson and Ludacris in this sequel.  In previous films, I didn?t really care for their performances or their characters because I found them very uninteresting and the performances to be a little hacky?I always found them to be trying too hard to either be funny or be cool.  However, in this one, I found I really enjoyed them.  In fact, I actually found myself laughing at Gibson?s antics?something I never did in the other films.

Statham, seen here in what I can only describe as the cover to his
acoustic emo rock album.

Speaking of the cast, this film was the last feature to have Paul Walker in it due to his untimely death.  Overall, the production did a great job of using face-replacement, body doubles and digital scene swaps from previous films to fill in what they weren?t able to get before Walker passed.  More importantly, though, the story does a tremendous job of closing off Brian?s part of the family?s journey and it created something that offered closure and offered it up with a heaping dose of emotion.  It was honestly very hard to not cry watching it.  I?m not saying I did because I totes didn?t.  Someone broke into my home and started cutting onions and the speed at which they entered my domicile caused dust to stir and get in my eyes but I certainly didn?t cry.

This was very sweet--SHUT UP!  You're the one crying.

Hey, Lucas Black is back.  I wonder if we'll ever see him
in another one...
My complaints about the film are very few.  For example, the story is in a little bit of need for some further development.  This especially comes into play with Djimon Hounsou?s character.  While his placement makes sense it doesn?t stop him from feeling like he was a last minute addition to the story.  Additionally, the film expands on Letty?s amnesia and decides to resolve it but both its resolution and its treatment is very lackluster and very sloppily thrown into the mix.  Finally, I was a little disappointed that The Rock was written out of most of the story but when he comes back into play when the film?s mini-war starts up, this complaint becomes null and void because he makes a show that would rival his best wrestling match he?s ever done.

Looking at this picture will instantly cause you to go through puberty.
If you've already gone through puberty, prepare to go through it again.

Like I said, I won?t call Furious 7 a guilty pleasure because this movie is just hardcore popcorn action movie greatness.  James Wan makes the movie look fantastic, the cast is great, the stunts are eye-poppingly incredible, the action is exciting as hell and it continues to prove why this franchise makes butt loads of cash and that it isn?t slowing down and getting complacent.  From beginning to end, the film is a slick spectacle of insanity and it?s a freakin? blast to sit through.

San Andreas

***DISCLAIMER*** The following review is entirely my opinion. If you comment (which I encourage you to do) be respectful. If you don't agree with my opinion (or other commenters), that's fine. To each their own. These reviews are not meant to be statements of facts or endorsements, I am just sharing my opinions and my perspective when watching the film and is not meant to reflect how these films should be viewed. Finally, the reviews are given on a scale of 0-5. 0, of course, being unwatchable. 1, being terrible. 2, being not great. 3, being okay. 4, being great and 5, being epic! And if you enjoy these reviews feel free to share them and follow the blog or follow me on Twitter (@RevRonster) for links to my reviews and the occasional live-Tweet session of the movie I'm watching!  Please let the sequel be called Comic Sans Andreas.



San Andreas - 3 out of 5

There was a time when disaster films were all the rage?possibly during a time when people actually used the phrase ?all the rage.?  Since that majestic time in days gone by, the disaster film has sorta become the laughing stock of the movie world.  Sometimes, when they are combined in other genres like science fiction, you can make a popcorn disaster film that is a lot of fun to watch; think Independence Day.  Other times you get disaster films that are just?um?laughable; think The Day After Tomorrow or 2012.  And then you get a disaster film that feels like it will be laughable but they put The ?Dwayne Johnson? Rock in it and you have a decent and fairly fun and exciting disaster feature called San Andreas.

"If this fault line smells what I'm cooking."

An earthquake just happened but they had to stop
to watch two dogs fighting over the remains
of a homeless guy who died.
A Caltech seismologist Lawrence Hayes (Paul Giamatti) is testing a model for predicting earthquakes and discovers that the San Andreas Fault (oh, that?s how they got the name) is shifting like a mofo and all hell is about to break loose in the most scientifically inaccurate but cinematically climatic fashion.  When Mother Nature gets her whole lotta shakin? going on, an LA Fire Department Air Rescue pilot named Ray (Dwayne ?The People?s Champion? Johnson) finds that his family is stuck in the growing destruction.  Hoping to lay the smack down on the ?quake and possible hit it with the Rock Bottom or the People?s Elbow, Ray sets out to save his ex-wife (Carla Gugino) and his daughter Blake (Alexandra Daddario), before the entire state of California is leveled and sent packing into the ocean.

"This earthquake is due to Starbucks' denial of Christ and their red cups!"

When I sit down to watch films like this one, I?m not expecting intricate dialogue, rich characters or complex narratives.  That would be silly.  When I start up a film like San Andreas, I want epic scenes of destruction and characters that are just developed enough to make me care for them.  For what the film is trying to be, this movie isn?t too bad, fairly exciting and fun and with its moments of tension.

Hey, Kylie Minoque is in the film...I won't spoil for how short of a time though.

"Tell the Titanic that I've always loved her!"
Like I stated, the characters in this film aren?t that developed or that deep and are just developed enough to care about them.  It?s doesn?t hurt that the cast of Johnson, Gugino and Daddario are pretty decent in their roles, either.  The story also introduces some characters who team with Blake to try and rendezvous with her father and this introduction offers up a nice development in the story; one that turns the usual damsel in distress plot thread on its ear.  Before the quake hits, Blake meets a young man named Ben (Hugo Johnstone) and his brother Ollie (Art Parkinson) and usually this development in a film would mean that Ben is around to make sure Blake doesn?t get killed and is here to protect her and see her reunite with her dad.  Sure, Ben does the initial rescue after the boyfriend of Blake?s mom (played by Ioan Gruffudd) deserts her; however, after this point, Blake is in charge and she leads the team to safety.  It was actually really refreshing to see the film intentionally not go the clich? route?especially considering that a film like this is cemented firmly in a foundation of formulaic sequences and a routine story.

It's really unsettling to realize that The Rock was hitting A LOT of bodies
as he piloted that boat through the flooded city.

Visually, the film looks cool and there?s a lot of disaster spectacle going on:  Tons of skyscrapers collapsing, a tsunami, fires and a whole lot of shit hitting the fan around every corner.  Sure, we get the cheap and easy sequences where you think the main characters are in peril and they pull through but the director really set up these sequences successfully and if made you feel, even for a millisecond, like they really won?t pull through.  These visuals also result in a CG smorgasbord to create this orgy of destruction but, in the end, the CG is pretty good.  There are moments when it didn?t look the best but, overall, the computer effects were effective in creating the reality of LA crumbling down.

If Carla Gugino is trapped in a earthquake-destroyed city, we move heaven
and hell to get her back.  She's too precious to us to lose.

On the negative side, the story is very formulaic and not much different from other disaster films.  In fact, if it wasn?t for the cast, locale and minor plot points, it?s nearly indistinguishable from other films of this ilk.  Additionally, the story laughably, and in a grossly over-the-top way, vilifies the character of Daniel Riddick; Ioan Gruffudd?s character.  Obviously, the story wants you to dislike him because he?s the new boyfriend of The Rock?s ex-wife and you want the story to get them back together but the entire production is going laughably out of its way to make him a complete and utter piece of shit.  He abandons his girlfriend?s daughter and pushes innocent people out of the way and into the path of destruction?also, he?s rich, so take that 1 percenters!  This wouldn?t have been an issue if the story didn't introduce him as a fairly decent person and if their turn to make him someone you want to see die by either being swallowed by shifting tectonic plates or falling towers wasn?t so ridiculously over-the-top.

I'm assuming the reason they were so hard on Gruffudd's character was, at the time,
he was in the bad Fantastic Four film.  A status that has since been changed
to the adequate Fantastic Four film.

As far as disaster movies go, San Andreas is fairly entertaining.  It does suffer from a story that feels like it was crafted thanks to the powers of a disaster movie generator and the plot?s treatment of Daniel feels petty?not to mention that, like all disaster films, if you think too long about what is happening, you have to come to terms with the fact you are watching thousands upon thousands of innocent people dying and are made to care about only a small handful of these people?but despite this, the film does have some wicked visuals, has a great cast and does a fantastic job of creating scenes that made my palms sweat and put me on the edge of my seat.

Wait!  Colton Haynes was in this film?!?  Get back to Starling City...I miss you on Arrow.

Saturday, 7 November 2015

HERCULES (2014) REVIEW : REALISTIC VERSION OF ZEUS'S SON [WITH 3D REVIEW]


Sang legenda yunani kembali lagi di layar lebar. Setelah di awal tahun telah disapa oleh Kellan Lutz yang memerankannya lewat The Legend of Hercules dan mendapatkan banyak sekali respon negatif untuk filmnya. Maka, Universal Pictures dengan berani di tahun yang sama mengeluarkan versi lain dari legenda yunani bernama Hercules ini. Sang putra Zeus versi universal ini diperankan oleh Dwayne Johnsson dan dirilis dipertengahan tahun dalam memperingati musim panas di US.


Brett Ratner ditunjuk oleh pihak Universal untuk mengarahkan film ini. Track Record Brett Ratner memang tidak cukup bagus lantaran usahanya untuk mengarahkan final round dari film X-Men yang benar-benar mendapat kritik pedas baik dari kritikus maupun para penikmat film. Dengan reputasi tersebut, tentu akan membuat beban Brett Ratner bertambah ketika dirinya menggarap film Hercules versi terbaru kali ini.


Tentu akan menceritakan Hercules (Dwayne Johnsson) sang putra zeus yang legendaris ini. Hercules adalah sosok tentara bayaran dengan lima sahabatnya yang setia bersamanya. Suatu saat, datanglah sosok Ergenia (Rebecca Ferguson) yang meminta dirinya untuk melindungi dan melatih para pasukan kerajaan Thrace agar bisa melawan oleh musuhnya.

Dengan iming-iming bayaran emas yang banyak, Hercules dan lima sahabatnya ini pun menerima permintaan dari anak Lord Cortys (John Hurt) ini. Mereka pun melatih pasukan dari kerajaan Thrace hingga suatu ketika sosok Hercules menemukan kembali cerita-cerita masa lalu yang membuat dirinya tertekan. Cerita tentang dirinya, istrinya, serta anaknya.


Literally myth bedtime story about Hercules.

Lagi, lagi, dan lagi, usaha para sineas Hollywood untuk mengangkat lagi para mitos-mitos, dongeng-dongeng yang sudah ada sejak dulu kala untuk diangkat ke sebuah layar lebar. Meng-upgrade-nya dengan segala sesuatu yang bisa menjadikan karya tersebut menjadi berbeda. Sayangnya, dengan rombakan yang dilakukannya itu malah menjadikan karyanya bak bumerang yang menyerang balik kepada sineas yang bertanggung jawab dalam proyek tersebut.

Kali ini Brett Ratner mencoba untuk menggunakan kemampuannya untuk mengolah sebuah dongeng-dongeng atau mitos legendaris yang sudah dekat dengan penontonnya. Hercules miliknya yang pada awalnya berjudul Hercules : The Thracian Wars ini ternyata tak jauh berbeda dengan karya-karya sejenis lainnya. Hercules yang diperankan oleh Dwayne Johnsson ini pun membangun alternate universe sendiri yang memanusiakan sosok Hercules yang kuat.

Melenceng dari dongeng-dongeng sebelumnya tentu bukan suatu masalah besar di dunia perfilman Hollywood. Tetapi, bagaimana Brett Ratner ini mencoba untuk memanusiakan sosok Hercules dengan arahan yang minimalis olehnya ini toh malah membuat film ini kurang memuaskan. Alih-alih memberikan alternatif cerita yang lebih realistis, and the result is Hercules just being another Swords and Sandals movie that we have ever seen before.


Alih-alih ingin memberikan sebuah alternate cerita yang berbeda, nyatanya Hercules versi Brett Ratner ini malah tampil lemah. Memang bukan yang terlemah antara film-film dengan tema sejenis beberapa bagian ada yang bisa dinikmati. Sayangnya, Hercules memiliki template yang sama dengan beberapa film sejenis. Kesannya Hercules milik Brett Ratner ini seperti versi lain dari film kolosal 300 milik Zack Snyder dengan minus CGI dan Slow motion effect dipadu padankan dengan Pompeii milik Paul W.S. Anderson.

Usaha Brett Ratner untuk keluar dari jalur dalam menceritakan ulang sosok putra Zeus ini pun terkesan sia-sia. Toh, Hercules malah menghilangkan banyak bagian dari dongeng-dongeng yang sudah dekat dengan penontonnya. Sosok Hercules yang notabene adalah setengah dewa dan setengah manusia ini diceritakan dengan masalahnya yang kompleks. Good point of view to tell, tetapi minimnya pengarahan membuat Hercules ini malah tidak menunjukkan sosok Hercules yang sebenarnya.

Dengan adanya kompleksitas di departemen cerita, tentu akan melahirkan beberapa subplot yang bergerak di sepanjang durasi. Pergerakan subplot itu terlalu sempit untuk diceritakan dan tentu berpengaruh untuk penuturannya dengan durasi sepanjang 100 menit. Inisiatif Brett Ratner untuk menyembunyikan subplot yang menarik tetapi sayangnya Brett Ratner seperti lupa untuk menjelaskan apa yang sudah di-tease-kan di awal cerita. Akhirnya, seperti dipaksa tampil segala cerita tumpah ke 30 menit akhir film yang membuat film ini terasa draggy.


Akan terasa di beberapa bagian bahwa ada beberapa cerita yang sepertinya belum diceritakan. Ya, Hercules milik Brett Ratner ini terkesan menjadi sebuah sekuel dari film miliknya yang nyatanya tak pernah ada karena penuturan ceritanya terasa tak lengkap. Brett Ratner terkesan malas untuk menceritakan hal yang sudah disajikan di layar dan meyakinkan dirinya bahwa penonton mungkin sudah tahu seperti apa cerita dari film arahannya ini.

Bagi penonton yang menginginkan cerita dongeng yunani dengan demi-god atau sejenisnya, harus siap-siap untuk kecewa. Karena, Hercules akan benar-benar meninggalkan segala jenis fantasinya yang seharusnya menjadi sebuah trademark untuk sosok Hercules. Maka dari itu, buang jauh-jauh ekspektasi itu agar tidak merasakan kekecewaan. Sebagian kecil dari cerita fantasi tersebut mungkin dituangkan dalam cerita pembuka yang ternyata bukanlah bagian dari plot di film Hercules milik Brett Ratner ini.


Hercules kali ini memang akan terkesan humanis dengan point of view berbeda yang diambil oleh Brett Ratner. Sayangnya, Brett Ratner masih belum menunjukkan kepiawaiannya untuk mengarahkan sebuah film dan menjadikan Hercules tampak meyakinkan. Pengolahannya pun jatuh menjadi sajian yang sama seperti film sejenis lainnya. Brett Ratner masih belum bisa belajar atas kegagalannya di X-Men : The Last Stand. Toh, Hercules masih belum memperlihatkan bahwa Brett Ratner adalah sutradara yang kompeten.
Hercules pun dirilis dalam format 3D. Berikut review-nya

DEPTH
Efek Depth untuk format 3D Hercules cukup bagus meskipun di beberapa adegan masih kurang terjamah.

POP OUT
Pop Out sangat berinteraksi dengan baik kepada penontonnya. Dan inilah kelebihan dari film Hercules di segi teknik.

Ya, tontonlah film ini dalam format 3D karena Hercules sangat memanjakan penontonnya dengan format yang berbeda. Setidaknya format 3D akan menghibur anda dengan betapa mediocre-nya Hercules arahan Brett Ratner ini.

Sunday, 1 November 2015

FURIOUS 7: Stunningly Stupid Stunts Frame A Fitting Farewell


Now playing at a multiplex near you:

FURIOUS 7 (Dir. James Wan 2015)


Up until recently, I hadn?t seen any of the FAST AND THE FURIOUS movies. So, not wanting to go in cold, I watched the previous six entries to catch up with the adventures of FBI agent turned outlaw Brian O?Conner (the late Paul Walker) and his ex-con BFF Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel) before catching a screening of the latest, FURIOUS 7, which opens today. 

I really wasn?t into the series at first ? after the third one, TOYKO DRIFT (a stand-alone installment with different characters than the rest), I was wondering ?when do these start getting good??

But then I found four through six to be enjoyably stupid formula action films filled with ridiculous over-the-top stunts, of course involving cars but also planes, trains, tanks, etc., that are somehow ridiculously in-your-face effective.

Walker, perhaps the lead protagonist of the series, was killed in a tragic automobile accident halfway through filming, but he had completed enough that it?s barely noticeable that they helped flesh out his performance with his brothers (Caleb and Cody) acting as stand-ins with Walker?s face grafted on them via CGI.

As teased, Marvel-style in THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS 6, this time Walker, Diesel, and their trusty team made up of Tyrese Gibson, Ludacris, Michelle Rodriguez, and Jordana Brewster face off against Jason Statham as the brother of the previous film?s villain, something they borrowed from the DIE HARD franchise I guess.

Despite the fact that he hosted Saturday Night Live last weekend to promote this movie, Dwayne ?The Rock? Johnson sits most of this one out as Statham puts him in the hospital after a brutal fight at the Diplomatic Security Service offices.


Statham also blows up Diesel?s house (yay - explosions!), and the two almost get into an epic brawl, but it's interrupted by a smug, Belgian beer-loving Kurt Russell as a government agent, pretty much the equivalent of the role Harrison Ford played in EXPENDABLES 3.

Russell introduces the film's McGuffin: a program called ?God's Eye,? which can simultaneously access every surveillance camera on the planet. The device was developed by a hacker named Ramsey (Nathalie Emmanuel), who's been kidnapped by a terrorist (Djimon Hounsou), and Russell, who calls himself ?Mr. Nobody,? wants Diesel to get the gang back together to rescue Ramsey, and retrieve ?God's Eye,? which will lead them to the sinister Statham.

This involves the movie's biggest money shot, in which our fearless (well, except for Gibson - he shows fear) team skydive five cars out of a cargo plane in order to hijack a convoy in Azerbaijan. This jaw-dropping sequence climaxes with Walker scrambling to escape a bus before it falls off a cliff, very ITALIAN JOB-esque.

After that we get another scorching set piece that has Walker and Diesel jumping a car between the Etihad Towers complex in Abu Dhabi. Shades of MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: GHOST PROTOCOL and, unfortunately, TOWER HEIST, are inescapable, but the scene is exciting and funny enough to transcend them.

The big finale comes down to Diesel and Statham, who is simply the best villain the series has ever had (take that, Braga!) in brutal one on one combat in a collapsing parking deck, with cutaways to the other characters' own action dilemmas in a chaotic orgy of cars, grenades, drones, and helicopters. Yep, stuff gets blown up real good.

Working from a screenplay by Chris Morgan, who scripted the bulk of the F & F series, James Wan (SAW, THE CONJURING) confidently takes over from Justin Lin (director of installments 3-6), and shows that he's as suited for slick formula action tropes as he is for horror.

FURIOUS 7 is an above average assembly line action movie (especially compared to THE EXPENDABLES 3), and will delight fans of the franchise, though the biggest fans of the franchise appear to be Diesel, who co-produced, and his crew themselves. Diesel obviously genuinely means it when he says such lines like ?I don't have friends, I got family,? and the concluding tribute montage to Walker reflects that sweetly.

If I didn't know he had died I don't think I would've noticed that the work they did to cover Walker's absence. Whether CGI or his brothers as body doubles, the results are solidly convincing, and the movie stands as a fitting, heartfelt farewell in full.

And yes, I teared up a bit during that closing memorial montage. To steal a line from Phil Hartman's Bill McNeil from the great '90s sitcom Newsradio: ?You would have to be a robot not to cry at that movie!?

More later... 

Saturday, 31 October 2015

FURIOUS 7: Stunningly Stupid Stunts Frame A Fitting Farewell


Now playing at a multiplex near you:

FURIOUS 7 (Dir. James Wan 2015)


Up until recently, I hadn?t seen any of the FAST AND THE FURIOUS movies. So, not wanting to go in cold, I watched the previous six entries to catch up with the adventures of FBI agent turned outlaw Brian O?Conner (the late Paul Walker) and his ex-con BFF Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel) before catching a screening of the latest, FURIOUS 7, which opens today. 

I really wasn?t into the series at first ? after the third one, TOYKO DRIFT (a stand-alone installment with different characters than the rest), I was wondering ?when do these start getting good??

But then I found four through six to be enjoyably stupid formula action films filled with ridiculous over-the-top stunts, of course involving cars but also planes, trains, tanks, etc., that are somehow ridiculously in-your-face effective.

Walker, perhaps the lead protagonist of the series, was killed in a tragic automobile accident halfway through filming, but he had completed enough that it?s barely noticeable that they helped flesh out his performance with his brothers (Caleb and Cody) acting as stand-ins with Walker?s face grafted on them via CGI.

As teased, Marvel-style in THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS 6, this time Walker, Diesel, and their trusty team made up of Tyrese Gibson, Ludacris, Michelle Rodriguez, and Jordana Brewster face off against Jason Statham as the brother of the previous film?s villain, something they borrowed from the DIE HARD franchise I guess.

Despite the fact that he hosted Saturday Night Live last weekend to promote this movie, Dwayne ?The Rock? Johnson sits most of this one out as Statham puts him in the hospital after a brutal fight at the Diplomatic Security Service offices.


Statham also blows up Diesel?s house (yay - explosions!), and the two almost get into an epic brawl, but it's interrupted by a smug, Belgian beer-loving Kurt Russell as a government agent, pretty much the equivalent of the role Harrison Ford played in EXPENDABLES 3.

Russell introduces the film's McGuffin: a program called ?God's Eye,? which can simultaneously access every surveillance camera on the planet. The device was developed by a hacker named Ramsey (Nathalie Emmanuel), who's been kidnapped by a terrorist (Djimon Hounsou), and Russell, who calls himself ?Mr. Nobody,? wants Diesel to get the gang back together to rescue Ramsey, and retrieve ?God's Eye,? which will lead them to the sinister Statham.

This involves the movie's biggest money shot, in which our fearless (well, except for Gibson - he shows fear) team skydive five cars out of a cargo plane in order to hijack a convoy in Azerbaijan. This jaw-dropping sequence climaxes with Walker scrambling to escape a bus before it falls off a cliff, very ITALIAN JOB-esque.

After that we get another scorching set piece that has Walker and Diesel jumping a car between the Etihad Towers complex in Abu Dhabi. Shades of MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: GHOST PROTOCOL and, unfortunately, TOWER HEIST, are inescapable, but the scene is exciting and funny enough to transcend them.

The big finale comes down to Diesel and Statham, who is simply the best villain the series has ever had (take that, Braga!) in brutal one on one combat in a collapsing parking deck, with cutaways to the other characters' own action dilemmas in a chaotic orgy of cars, grenades, drones, and helicopters. Yep, stuff gets blown up real good.

Working from a screenplay by Chris Morgan, who scripted the bulk of the F & F series, James Wan (SAW, THE CONJURING) confidently takes over from Justin Lin (director of installments 3-6), and shows that he's as suited for slick formula action tropes as he is for horror.

FURIOUS 7 is an above average assembly line action movie (especially compared to THE EXPENDABLES 3), and will delight fans of the franchise, though the biggest fans of the franchise appear to be Diesel, who co-produced, and his crew themselves. Diesel obviously genuinely means it when he says such lines like ?I don't have friends, I got family,? and the concluding tribute montage to Walker reflects that sweetly.

If I didn't know he had died I don't think I would've noticed that the work they did to cover Walker's absence. Whether CGI or his brothers as body doubles, the results are solidly convincing, and the movie stands as a fitting, heartfelt farewell in full.

And yes, I teared up a bit during that closing memorial montage. To steal a line from Phil Hartman's Bill McNeil from the great '90s sitcom Newsradio: ?You would have to be a robot not to cry at that movie!?

More later...